Fiber Laser vs. CO2 Laser for Cutting Metal
As fiber laser technology emerges into the metal cutting industry, more shop owners
and customers may be asking: What’s the difference between fiber laser and CO2 laser
technology? Is one better than the other for cutting metal? Basically, they each have
their own advantages – but also significant differences that make it worthwhile to
consider which is best for your application.
CO2 lasers have been widely used by metal cutting shops for decades, and have been
greatly improved upon in the past few years. Fiber lasers have been used in other
industries for years, but fiber is a more recent development for sheet metal cutting
applications in job shops.
Fiber lasers use a fiber cable to deliver a laser beam, whereas CO2 systems operate
with mirrors. The beam of a fiber laser is typically half the size of a CO2 system laser
beam and can create a cutting kerf as small as .004”.
The primary differences between fiber and CO2 laser systems focus on several areas:
Metal Thickness
• Fiber cuts thinner materials, particularly stainless steel, faster than CO2 laser –
mainly, materials 0.25” and thinner.
• CO2 laser typically cuts thicker metals (0.25” and thicker) faster and more
accurately than most fiber lasers can, producing a better cut quality for those
parts.
• An “evening out” point between the two laser options can be considered at
approximately 0.375”.
• With a vast majority of cutting applications in sheet cutting now using materials
under 0.25” thick, it’s worth considering using fiber laser cutting services.
Speed/Throughput
• Fiber laser cuts stainless steel approximately three times faster than CO2
systems. For example, using fiber to cut 12 or 16 gauge stainless steel offers
significant time and cost savings because of its high speed cutting capabilities.
• Fiber laser creates less downtime than CO2 systems, especially important for
high-volume production runs on appropriate parts.
Cut Quality/Accuracy
• On thinner materials, fiber laser delivers a superior cut quality than CO2, but CO2
typically produces cleaner-cut parts from thicker materials.
• General tolerances of +/-.005” are easily held in materials .250” or thinner.
Tighter tolerances can be achieved but may require more testing and setup time.
Flexibility & Cost-Saving Potential
• Fiber laser can cut brass and copper, but CO2 can’t.
• Fiber laser can cleanly cut small, intricate parts or larger parts up to 10 feet long.
• With automated sheet loading system we can run minimally attended or even
lights out to save on labor costs.
• With fiber laser, flat blank prototypes can be created fast, without any tooling
costs. We also have the ability to bend and form prototypes and production parts
in our brake presses or metal stamping presses.
• Fiber systems typically have lower operating and maintenance costs than CO2
systems and require less down time.
• With on-site fiber laser services, additional cost savings can be realized by
starting with a part print and carrying through to the finished part, all in one
facility. We can handle your project from prototype all the way through
production.
JMT LEO LASER |
JMT FURIOUS LASER |
Ultimately, the best cutting method for a given part depends on your needs for part
quality and cost per part.
Source: Wisconsin Metal Part
0 comments :
Post a Comment